Автор анализирует особенности историографической ситуации в современной Латвии. Выявлены основные особенности развития исторических исследований транзитных обществ. Проанализированы системные черты и особенности развития латышской историографии как формы академических исторических исследований и развития исторической национальной памяти в контексте «больших нарративов». «Большие нарративы» в современной латышской историографии анализируются как основная форма развития исторического знания. Показана взаимозависимость развития политического национализма и исторической науки. Проанализированы основные формы и направления развития исторических исследований в Латвии в контексте общих трансформаций исторического знания. Показана роль истории в развитии национальной идентичности и актуализации национализма.
The author analyzes features of historiographical situation in the present-day Latvia. The basic features of the development of historical studies in transit societies are analyzed. The system features and characteristics of the Latvian historiography as a form of academic historical studies and the development of historical memory in the context of the national "grand narratives" are also discussed. The "grand narratives" in contemporary Latvian historiography are analyzed as the main form of historical knowledge. The relationships of political nationalism and historical science are studied in the article. The basic forms and directions of development of historical studies in Latvia in the context of the general transformation of historical knowledge are also discussed. The role of history in the development of national identity and nationalism actualization is also studied.
1. Agicic D. Bosna ja nasa! Mitovi i stereotipi o drzavnosti, nacionalnom i vjerskom identitetu te pripadnosti u novijim udžbenicima povijesti / D. Agicic // Historijski mitovi na Balkanu / red. H. Kamberovic. Sarajevo, 2003. – S. 139 – 160;
2. Alexander N. The “Moment of Maneuver”: “Race”, Ethnicity and Nation on Postapartheid South Africa // Antinomies of Modernity. Essays on Race, Orient, Nation / eds. V. Kaivar and S. Mazumdar. – Durham, 2003. – P. 180 – 195.
3. Alstadt A.L. Rewriting Turkic History in Gorbachev Era / A.L. Alstadt // Journal of Soviet Nationalities. – 1991. – Vol. II. – No 2. – P. 73 – 90.
4. Antic A. Evolicija i uloga tri kompleksa istorijskih mitova u srpskom akademskom i javnom mnenju u poskednih deset godina // Historijski mitovi na Balkanu / red. H. Kamberovic. Sarajevo, 2003. – S. 259 – 290.
5. Boyd C.P. Historia Patria: Politics, History and National Identity in Spain, 1875–1975 / C.P. Boyd. – Princeton, 1997.
6. Brunnbauer U. Drevna nacionalnost i vjekovna borba za drzavnost: historiografski mitovi u Respublici Makedoniji // Historijski mitovi na Balkanu / red. H. Kamberovic. Sarajevo, 2003. – S. 291 – 305.
7. Friedman J. History, Political Identity and Myth / J. Friedman // Lietuvos etnologija. Lithuanian Ethnology. Studies in Social Anthropology and Ethnology. – 2001. – No 1.
8. Goldstein I. Granica na Drini – znacenje i razvoj mitologema / I. Goldstein // Historijski mitovi na Balkanu / red. H. Kamberovic. Sarajevo, 2003. – S. 109 – 138.
9. Hanovs D. Eiropas aristokratijas kultura 17. – 19. gadsimta. – Riga, 2014.
10. Hein L., Sekden M. The Lessons of War, Global Power and Social Change // Censoring History. Citezenship and Memory in Japan, Germany and the United States / eds. L. Hein and M. Selden. – Armonk – NY. – L., 2000. – P. 3 – 52.
11. Jilge W. Historical Memory and National Identity Building in Ukraine since 1991 / W. Jilge // European History: Challenge for a Common Future / ed. A. Pok, J. Rugen, J. Scherrer. – Hamburg, 2002. – P. 111 – 134.
12. Kazuhiko K. The Continuing Legacy of Japanese Colonialism: the Japan-South Korea Joint Study Group on History Textbooks / K. Kazuhiko // Censoring History. Citezenship and Memory in Japan, Germany and the United States / eds. L. Hein and M. Selden. – Armonk – NY. – L., 2000. – P. 203 – 225.
13. Lindner R. New Directions in Belarusian Studies besieged past: national and court historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus / R. Lindner // Nationalities Papers. – 1999. – Vol. 27. – No 4. – P. 631.
14. Ohloblyn O. Ukrainian Historiography. 1917 – 1956 // Annals of Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the United States. – 1957. – Vol. 6 – 7. – No 4. – P. 307 – 435.
15. Perica V. Uloga crkava u konstrukciji drzavotvornih mitova Hrvatse i Srbije // Historijski mitovi na Balkanu / red. H. Kamberovic. Sarajevo, 2003. – S. 203 – 224.
16. Rottier P. Legitimizing the Ata Meken: the Kazakh intelligentsia write a history of their Homeland / P. Rottier // Ab Imperio. – 2004. – No 1. – Р. 467.
17. Thomson D. Must History stay Nationalistic? The Prison of Closed Intellectuals Frontiers / D. Thomson // Encounter. – 1968. – Vol. 30. – No 6. – Р. 27.
18. Troebst S. “We are Transnistrians”. Post-Soviet Identity management in the Dniester Valley / S. Troebst // Ab Imperio. – 2003. – No 1. – P. 437 – 466.
19. Wynar L.R. Mykhailo Hrushevsky: Ukrainian-Russian Confrontation in Historiography. – NY., 1988.